• yesoutwater@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    What is complicated? You give two bullet points and a potential solution that all fall under the umbrella of “paying someone.” This solves the problem.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a simple solution to what’s a more nuanced problem.

      Be honest. If faced with the choice to cut hours/roles, move roles overseas, or to “pay more”, do you think many business owners will do the latter?

      You need to consider the nuance here, otherwise you find a similar situation to the minimum wage rises, where businesses complain about the operations not being viable because they need to start treating workers like humans.

      • yesoutwater@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, I agree. We definitely need to consider the “nuance” of a situation where business is asked to treat their workers like human beings.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can be as obtuse as you want. You know I’m right, and it’s exactly why legislation is needed to ensure these things are done correctly to stop businesses from exploiting the rules.