• Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I imagine it’s pretty much the same amount of plastic as they’ve always had.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bottles are 80% more plastic than pouches and cost more. The only good part is those pouches are not usually recyclable at all and sometimes bottles get recycled.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Sometimes” feels a bit generous. From a quick search I can find estimates that 5-9% of all plastic is recycled. It might be higher or lower depending on the specific kinds of plastic these bottles use, but most of it is probably ending up in a landfill anyways.

          • Zier@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was being generous. Aluminum, steel & glass are the only materials that get regularly recycled. All the others are usually trashed, even if you sent them to recycling.

      • nadram@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The correct choice would have been paper/cardboard bottles, which is easier to recycle

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Juice boxes have a plastic lining, which is still better for the environment but not necessarily easier to recycle.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Technically a shift from Mylar to PET might be more environmentally friendly, but yeah I would prefer cans or cardboard box drinks, you know: the ol waxed paperboard beverage carton

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            No it’s not structurally “plastic” but it’s not biodegradable or reusable which is the point at hand so I think it was a reasonable comparison. (I also said “basically plastic” which clearly indicates similarity rather than equation)

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Absolutely plastic lined all, I was just trying to be descriptive since that packaging type doesn’t seem to have any unique identifying names.