- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
You must log in or register to comment.
[🌽].pop() == 🍿"🚴".push() = "🚲🤸"
"☹️".reverse() == "☹️"You’re no fun
Look closer at the beauty mark, I flipped the emoji
wasn’t it
🙁
.
r
e
v
e
r
s
e
()deleted by creator
"
🙂
"
.
r
e
v
e
r
s
e
(
)
=
"
🙃
"
Then “b” backwards would have to be “d”
"E".reverse() == "∃"
Be the operator overload you wish to see in the world
“:-)”.reverse() == “)-:”
Close enough
Also, it should turn an error into an empty but successful call. /s
Calling
reverse()on a function should return its inverseisprime.reverse(True) // outputs 19 billion prime numbers. Checkmate, atheists.It’s a just a joke, but I feel like that actually says something pretty profound about duck typing, and how computable it actually is.
"🐈".concat() = "😼"deleted by creator
but
"🙂".reverse() == "🙃"Best I can do is
"\ude41🙂".split("").reverse().join("")returns
"\ude42🙁"JavaScript taking notes
You could implement that on a chat, but I wouldn’t do that on a string
Where’s your sense of adventure?!
