The Chinese studio granted early access on the condition that topics like “feminist propaganda” and “Covid-19” go unmentioned. What followed is the Streisand effect in full force.

“I feel that it only served to bring more attention on Game Science’s culture of sexism,” linktothepabst says. “All they had to do was let the game speak for itself, but it came off, to me, like an own goal, effectively stoking the flames between the people who were using this game as weapon against ‘wokeness in games’ and those who can level-headedly either enjoy the game and criticize GS or just ignore the game altogether.”

It’s the Streisand effect in full force: Try to hide something, and it becomes all the more visible. “Nobody was going to bring up Chinese politics unprompted,” Zhong says, “but the topic was there as soon as they released those guidelines.”

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have read that “document”, how does that change anything I said? Have you not seen this toxic “anti-woke” bile that has been popping up for every new game release now? Like we get that they hate woman, are super racist, and think that being gay or trans makes people not human, but I think they are a minority that should go back to living in the swap.

    And my comment getting a -40 makes me sad for the future if that many people are choosing to side with hate and discrimination.

    • Samvega
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Have you not seen this toxic “anti-woke” bile that has been popping up for every new game release now? Like we get that they hate woman, are super racist, and think that being gay or trans makes people not human, but I think they are a minority that should go back to living in the swap.

      They might be a statistical minority where you live, but that doesn’t mean they can’t assert political power and discriminate against scapegoated outgroups.