• Isoprenoid@programming.devEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    Land Value Tax is sounding pretty good, aye? By all means build your palace, but get ready to continually cough up the dough.

      • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        3 months ago

        No, not like property taxes.

        The important difference is that when you tax only the land and not the value of the improvements on top, it doesn’t discourage improving the land to its highest and best use the way that property taxes do.

        For example, downtown properties with surface parking lots on them (or similarly underdeveloped uses, like self-storage warehouses) ought to pay the same tax as the skyscrapers next door. That’s how you make it stop being profitable to build shitty surface parking lots and self-storage warehouses on prime real estate.

        Ditto for building McMansions on 1-acre lots instead of bungalows on 1/9-acre lots (or better yet, townhouses or small apartment buildings) in neighborhoods just outside of downtown.

      • AshelynEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        It’s a slightly different take on property taxes. Basically, the idea that all land is taxed at a fixed rate per acre no matter what is built on top. It’s also known as Georgism

          • Isoprenoid@programming.devEnglish
            3·
            3 months ago

            Correct, skyscrapers that can house a lot of people and businesses. It might be helpful if we were in a housing crisis. Good thing that isn’t happening across several developed countries across the world.

            Oh wait …