Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 年前Don't judge me I know that frequently they represent almost the same softwares but is just a matter of principles.discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1385
arrow-up1385imageDon't judge me I know that frequently they represent almost the same softwares but is just a matter of principles.discuss.tchncs.deChemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square50linkfedilink
minus-squarehappyhippo@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-22 年前Probably the wrongest definition ever of Free software. Here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
minus-squareTheInsane42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前The terminologies used are all over the place, not really helping to make a point. FOSS is not to clear as well, but helps.
minus-squarebaru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前 The terminologies used are all over the place There are pretty clear definitions for both. I noticed you got them completely wrong, but, well, that’s not due to the definitions being difficult or “all over the place”.
Probably the wrongest definition ever of Free software.
Here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
The terminologies used are all over the place, not really helping to make a point.
FOSS is not to clear as well, but helps.
There are pretty clear definitions for both. I noticed you got them completely wrong, but, well, that’s not due to the definitions being difficult or “all over the place”.