• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Facts? Ignore? I didn’t ignore them. I dismissed them. You claimed that he posts at what would be 9am in eastern Europe. I assume you are alluding to russia? Ok? I post at 11:00 at night sometimes too. And it’s irrelevant. Anyone can call out our blatant hypocrisy.

    As for the claim i am not arguing in good faith … are you?! You seem to be Dutch Ruddering with givesomefucks chronostriggerwarrning. You claim the OP is pro harming Palestine because he… is upset that a Biden official was ordered to block an investigation into Israel’s obvious genocide of Palestinians…. And then declare here is a plant who is trying to back… Trump, who’s stance is to show Israel “how its really done”. You know that makes you sound deranged, yea?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      You seem to be Dutch Ruddering with givesomefucks

      I had to look up what this weird shit even is. Uh, so yeah, I’m totally sexually gratifying someone who just banned me for calling out the fraud.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well you are right in that i got the wrong rudder mate. I meant to say chronostriggerwarning, not givesomefucks. Givesomefucks at least had an argument. You on the other hand avoid arguments like the plague. You refuse to make one, and you refuse to argue against one. And at this point I’m going to make the assumption thats because your position is untenable.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Do you even know what an argument is?

            I never made an argument, bad faith or otherwise. You committed an ad hominem attack on the OP, refused to argue against any of his points. Then did repeated cringe high fives with your rudder mate.

            The only thing i did was call you out for doing so, by asking for justification for why you are attacking the character of the OP. If you want to claim that request is too burdensome, that’s fine by me, as that’s a reflection on your character, and was what i was highlighting in the first place. So well done on that.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              ad hominem attack

              This is a bad faith argument alone. It’s a way of dismissing a valid concern about a person’s long history of doing something. You’re pretending I have to re-prove it every time someone says I do but I’m under zero obligation to be sealioned.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                No, what you did was text book ad hominem attack. In the literal sense. The only way to revert that is to justify why the character of the OP is important to his argument. Which you never successfully did. You alluded that he could be a Russian plant, that’s why he’s against Biden, because of the time he posts.

                If you had, say evidence that he posted on conservative instances in a way that is pro trump…. Or pro Israel… or what have you… it still would not make the argument he made invalid. And you would still be guilty of an ad hominem attack.

                The argument that Biden directed a veto preventing the investigation into Israel is fact and is damning in its own, even if made by a supposed trumper.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  text book ad hominem attack

                  I don’t care. The source of info is relevant, as are their clear ulterior motives.

                  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    How? How is it relevant?

                    Is it not true that Biden directed the Vetos?

                    Is it not true that after Vetoing investigation into genocide, calling on others to act on the charge of stopping others from feeling the hell that is war, is hypocritical?

                    Then it’s not a bad faith argument. They could have ulterior motives for making it, but it’s still 100% true. And it’s especially bad when your evidence for this ad hominem attack is as piss poor as what time he posts.