Last Tuesday, loads of Linux users—many running packages released as early as this year—started reporting their devices were failing to boot. Instead, they received a cryptic error message that included the phrase: “Something has gone seriously wrong.”

The cause: an update Microsoft issued as part of its monthly patch release. It was intended to close a 2-year-old vulnerability in GRUB, an open source boot loader used to start up many Linux devices. The vulnerability, with a severity rating of 8.6 out of 10, made it possible for hackers to bypass secure boot, the industry standard for ensuring that devices running Windows or other operating systems don’t load malicious firmware or software during the bootup process. CVE-2022-2601 was discovered in 2022, but for unclear reasons, Microsoft patched it only last Tuesday.

The reports indicate that multiple distributions, including Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Zorin OS, Puppy Linux, are all affected. Microsoft has yet to acknowledge the error publicly, explain how it wasn’t detected during testing, or provide technical guidance to those affected. Company representatives didn’t respond to an email seeking answers.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    Y’all, help a dummy out. I dual boot windows and Fedora. I only keep windows around for a very few college classes that require for screenwriting software. I have not booted into windows in months. I have a screenwriting class coming up in a week.

    How worried should I be? I am not great with computers, I run fedora mostly because I support the philosophy of Linux, less for the techy stuff. Please advice, Linux people. I’m scurred.

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does that screenwriting software require a lot of performance? You might opt to install Windows into a virtual machine, as described here: https://www.windowscentral.com/how-setup-windows-10-virtual-machine-linux

      Essentially you’re using some software to emulate a computer inside your computer that can run any operating system you want. It doesn’t need to touch your actual operating system installation, you can treat it as just another program. For your use case that sounds appropriate; you occasionally need to run specific software that has low system requirements. This way you can do that without risking Microsoft borking your Linux machine any time it feels like it.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d imagine it requires about as much as a word processor, since that’s basically what it is. A word processor with a specialized template and some nifty autofill options. Again, dummy here. If I’m running a virtual machine, can I create a file in it that is saved to my actual machine, or would I need to, like, email it to myself using the virtual windows os?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t use Virtualbox as it is a Hype 2 hypervisor not a hype 1. You want actually KVM via Libvirt. Libvirt also has the advantage of not requiring any proprietary software. (Just make sure to install the virtual drivers)

        • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That’s all fine and dandy but OP said they’re not very technical. Conceptually Virtualbox is a lot simpler to deal with. There’s a lot of advantages (philosophical and practical) to be had with a KVM or QEMU setup for sure, but if you want a simple to understand click-it-together setup then Virtualbox is better. If OP wants to graduate to a better setup then I hope they go for a good FOSS solution eventually but going straight for the deep end is rarely a good idea if you want people to understand what they’re doing.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Virtual manager is pretty straight forward. You click on create and follow the wizard. You can even have VMs running in the background

    • beefbot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sorry idk specifically how to avoid the update, but the linked ArsTechnica article has some advice

      Someone here advised & I’d agree: use a Windows VM, for things you haven’t found the Linux version of yet.

      Windows’s plan to screenshot everything will include your private artistic work too, so you’ll be doing yourself a favor

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      When I was still dual-booting Windows and Linux, I found that “raw disk” mode virtual machines worked wonders. I used VirtualBox, so you’d want a guide somewhat like this: https://superuser.com/questions/495025/use-physical-harddisk-in-virtual-box - other VM solutions are available, which don’t require you to accept an agreement with Oracle.

      Essentially, rather than setting aside a file on disk as your VM’s disk, you can set aside a whole existing disk. That can be a disk that already has Windows installed on it, it doesn’t erase what you have. Then you can start Windows in a VM and let it do its updates - since it can’t see the bootloader from within the VM, it can’t fuck it up. You can run any software that doesn’t have particularly high graphics requirement, too.

      I was also able to just “restart in Windows” if I wanted full performance for a game or something like that, but since Linux has gotten very good indeed at running games, that became less and less necessary until one day I just erased my Windows partition to recover the space.

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        And probably disable quick boot as I’m guessing the kernel is going to get pissed when you suddenly switch between virtualization and native

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve never run a virtual machine, because I’ve always had, frankly, really shitty laptops. Like… Cheapest of the cheap without being a Chromebook. Only decent computer I’ve ever bought got broken within a month. :(

        Can I run VMs on really low end specs? The screenwriting software is the only thing I need it for, and I’m assuming it’s pretty much the same as running a word processor.

        • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Provided your CPU has virtualization features (described here) then the performance overhead for virtualization is negligible. So very probably you’ll be fine.

            • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That depends, if you’re going to run a barebones W10 install with what amounts to a word processor I think 2GB should be enough. If you can run Chrome you can run a VM. 4GB if you’re feeling generous, that’s a fair compromise as compared to the disadvantages of dual booting.

              • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I remember trying to push the limits with a Windows 10 VM, and 2GB was the bare minimum;
                however, Windows loves to abuse virtual memory (basically using the main storage drive instead of RAM) and if that drive is a HDD the PC is little more than an IoT space heater.

                A relative of mine has a Windows 10 PC with 4GB of memory and it takes ~ 5 minutes to start Chrome after booting it up; it does have a lot of miscellaneous bloatware on it, though.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      However bad that sounds, you’re probably best off disabling all updates in windows. O&O shutup10 has a setting for that. Download it to a pendrive with Linux, and boot windows with network unplugged.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Does your device have 16gb of ram? If so install Windows in Virtual manager with the guest addons. It will allow copy and paste along with lots of other features while keeping Windows in its own area.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do you know which bootloader you have? There are two popular ones in use currently, one called systemd boot, the other is called grub. From reading this post only grub seems to be affected. I don’t really know which one fedora defaults to at the moment, and it likely depends on what happened during the installation process as well.

      • Russ@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they’re using Fedora, then it is highly likely that they are using GRUB as you have to very much go out of your way to utilize systemd-boot on Fedora the last time I checked.

    • Iapar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      What do you use? Maybe there is a Linux alternative to that so you don’t have to bother with a VM.

        • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Try running it in Bottles. A lot of programs work there without many issues.

          Use Bottles Flatpak

          Bottles uses WINE which is way more performant than a VM.

            • Norah - She/They
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Which are both custom versions of Wine with extra patches? They aren’t something like Luxortorpeda where it replaces the Windows game engine with a Linux one.

              • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Soda is the default Runtime, Proton (and outside of steam you should use Proton-GE) is the Steam one with way more compatibility for Games

                • Norah - She/They
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes, I am aware of what it uses, but thanks for over-explaining. I was commenting on that person’s implication that Soda and Proton, aren’t infact, just variations of Wine.

                  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The question mark made me think it was a question :)

                    The other commenter started a strange argument on what is what.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I looked into it, but I can’t afford it out of pocket. The school pays for final draft, but won’t cover anything else :/ If I could, that would definitely be my go-to

        • Presently42@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s free tho? Except for some minor limitations:

          “The free downloadable demonstration version of Fade In includes all key functionality except for online realtime collaboration, and will place a watermark on any printed/PDF output.”

          And there are ways around those

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh shit, this I did not know. I just Googled the price and I guess it only showed the paid version. Sweet! Thank you! If this works, I can officially uninstall Windows! That’s literally the last thing holding me to it. :D

            • Presently42@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              My pleasure. I will mention, that unless the author changed the program since last I used it, it also has a small popup every ten minutes or so, asking if you’d like to buy it. Remarkably, I didn’t find this terribly annoying, and forgot all about it until writing this comment - so don’t let that be a hindrance!

              • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                So I just emailed my professor, and he says that I can use fade in if the formatting is the same as final draft, and I buy the license so there’s no watermark. Which sucks, but fuggit it it lets me keep using Linux. Do you know if the formatting is the same? This is only my second ever screenwriting class.

                • Presently42@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The watermark is only applied if something is printed directly from Fade In: export and print somewhere else and there should be no watermark. As for the formatting, I don’t recall - but I do know, that everything is configurable; so you can make the formatting the same, if it differs

                  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Thank you for replying so quickly! I’ll email him back and let him know I should be able to get the formatting the same. I really appreciate your advice!

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Depends if you care more about performance or ease of use. Based on the fact that OP hadn’t considered VM as a solution, I assume they aren’t super familiar with hypervisors.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Virtualbox is a pain. Virtual manager is much easier and natively supported. You just click new and then follow the wizard

            • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s not at all the case in my experience. Sure virtual box modules can be harder to install, but libvirt has so many issues that the average user has no idea about. I’ve had networking issues, display issues, and so on. At one point it read the display scaling information and scaled down the VM display instead of scaling it up. Furthermore RedHat don’t even support virt manager anymore. They want you to use Cockpit. Honestly the all around best virtualization solution is probably VMWare or something like Gnome boxes or QuickEmu.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which screenwriting software? Have you tried running it under WINE?

      And do you HAVE to use that one in particular? Or can you use something like Trelby, Manuskript, or Scrite?

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah. I did love final draft when my school paid for it. I’ve never used fade in, but the three I mentioned are all free, too. I’m not sure what version of final draft you’re using, but it doesn’t really matter for this, as its support under WINE is pretty lacking. Good luck!!