Privacy benefits aside, does qubes run better than a typical vm like virtualbox? I tend to fiddle with distros a lot and I feel qubes might be a good choice, though I’m wondering about how efficient it is

  • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    28 days ago

    It’s faster than virtualbox because there is lower recourse use from the base system and it uses qemu. Qemu/kvm is the fastest option for vms on Linux, but it isn’t exklusiv to qubes, you can also use it via the terminal on any distro or with a GUI like gnome boxes

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    What is a “typical VM”?

    Qubes uses the type-1 Xen hypervisor that runs at a similar privilege to the kernel of other OSes. KVM is a type-1 hypervisor implemented as a Linux kernel module. VirtualBox is a type-2 hypervisor that runs in userspace. Of these three, Xen is the most performant hypervisor because virtualization is all it does.

    If by “typical VM” you mean a guest OS running inside a window of the host OS, then Qubes will always come out on top because the graphics pipeline is much less of a bottleneck.

  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    KVM and virt-manager are faster than VirtualBox.

    QubesOS uses a dedicated Hypervisor, Xen, which has this as its only job so I assume it is fast.