Popular iPad design app Procreate is coming out against generative AI, and has vowed never to introduce generative AI features into its products. The company said on its website that although machine learning is a “compelling technology with a lot of merit,” the current path that generative AI is on is wrong for its platform.

Procreate goes on to say that it’s not chasing a technology that is a threat to human creativity, even though this may make the company “seem at risk of being left behind.”

Procreate CEO James Cuda released an even stronger statement against the technology in a video posted to X on Monday.

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Built on a foundation of theft

    Sums up all AI

    EDIT: meant all gen AI

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      Does it? I worked on training a classifier and a generative model on freely available galaxy images taken by Hubble and labelled in a citizen science approach. Where’s the theft?

      • unsignedbit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Hard to say. Training models is generative; training a model from scratch is costly. Your input may not infringe copyright but the input before or after may have.

        • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          30 days ago

          I trained the generative models all from scratch. Pretrained models are not that helpful when it’s important to accurately capture very domain specific features.

          One of the classifiers I tried was based on zoobot with a custom head. Assuming the publications around zoobot are truthful, it was trained exclusively on similar data from a multitude of different sky surveys.

    • ribhu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      30 days ago

      That’s a blanket statement. While I understand the sentiment, what about the thousands of “AIs” trained on private, proprietary data for personal or private use by organizations that own the said data. It’s the not the technology but the lack of regulation and misaligned incentives.