The leap in temperatures over the past 13 months has exceeded the global heating forecasts – is this just a blip or a systemic shift?

Temperatures above 50C used to be a rarity confined to two or three global hotspots, but the World Meteorological Organization noted that at least 10 countries have reported this level of searing heat in the past year: the US, Mexico, Morocco, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Pakistan, India and China.

In Iran, the heat index – a measure that also includes humidity – has come perilously close to 60C, far above the level considered safe for humans.

Heatwaves are now commonplace elsewhere, killing the most vulnerable, worsening inequality and threatening the wellbeing of future generations. Unicef calculates a quarter of the world’s children are already exposed to frequent heatwaves, and this will rise to almost 100% by mid-century.

  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    1·
    4 months ago

    They say every accusation is a confession, and that’s exactly what this is.

    Yeah, I stopped reading at the lazy recycled rhetoric.

    As you love sources to much, provide a source showing that our energy consumption can increase perpetually

    Or is that not how things work?

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      1·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I stopped reading at the lazy recycled rhetoric.

      You mean like the rhetoric you have been using this entire time?

      As you love sources to much, provide a source showing that our energy consumption can increase perpetually

      Or is that not how things work?

      That’s not what I am saying. Go and read up on what fertile and fissile are. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertile_material

      You can convert a fertile material to a fissile material, then fission that to produce energy. The energy though was already in the fertile material to begin with plus a little bit from the neutrons you added. Eventually you will run out of fertile material, but that’s a long way away. For example’s sake you would might start with Th-232 which is fertile, add a neutron to get U-233, then fission U-233 to get energy plus some smaller elements called fission products. All of this is nuclear engineering 101. I am not a nuclear physicist and even I understand this.

      You can’t call everything you don’t understand or don’t know about made up. It would actually be funny if it wasn’t so depressing. The lack of scientific literacy some people have, and the unwillingness to learn you and others demonstrate is truly sad. It wouldn’t even be so bad if you were willing to admit you don’t know and just walk away. I can understand and respect not caring about nuclear enough to actually research it so long as you are willing to admit that. Instead you are sat there arguing about basic principles of nuclear physics and engineering, the kind of things I learned in sixth form, and calling me a liar just because I know more than you do.