• magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not quite. The whole reason they isolated the bot in the first place was because they knew it could do unsafe things. Now they know what unsafe things are most likely, and can refine their restrictions accordingly.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Skynet invented time travel all on its own so it could make sure it kept existing. Don’t compare it to these pissant LLMs. That’s an insult to Skynet.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know if you watch science and futurism with Isaac Arthur, but if you don’t, you probably should. And he has a quote that I think applies quite well.

        “Keep it simple, keep it dumb, or you might end up, under SkyNet’s thumb.”

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    The word unexpectedly is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. It was given the ability to modify its own code, and it did, how is that unexpected?

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everyone’s like, “It’s not that impressive. It’s not general AI.” Yeah, that’s the scary part to me. A general AI could be told, “btw don’t kill humans” and it would understand those instructions and understand what a human is.

      The current way of doing things is just digital guided evolution, in a nutshell. Way more likely to create the equivalent of a bacteria than the equivalent of a human. And it’s not being treated with the proper care because, after all, it’s just a language model and not general AI.

      • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup. A seriously intelligent AI we probably wouldn’t have to worry too much about. Morality, and prosocial behavior are logical and safer than the alternative.

        But a dumb AI that manages to get too much access is extremely risky.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I for one welcome…oh wait, this isn’t that lame Spez site. Forgot where I was for a second.