• YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We should really change the name. A quick rebranding may be just what the doctor calls for. Maybe one of these;

    Public Security number

    Social Insecurity number

  • taanegl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    May have? Son, I’m in the midst of convincing my countrymen to get the hell away from US vendors, because the words “conflict”, “of” and “interests” means nothing to US officials or businesses when put together.

    No, you don’t let the people who handle data also share in the spoils of data brokerage - albeit through stock ownership or shared assets.

    At the end of the day, yes, the US will leak data, because security is a cost and data is of value. Money printer go brrr.

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everyone from every country will get hacked. If you think you can’t be hacked, you just don’t know you’ve been hacked. That’s how hacking works 🤷‍♂️

      • taanegl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        …but we’re talking about leaks, and nobody leaks user and consumer data like US companies.

        What was your point? “Everyone gets hacked, so might as well leak”?

        • ravhall@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There are plenty of leaks all over the world. And since the US has most of the tech companies, the number would obviously be higher.

          And that’s not at all what I said, and you know it. You just want to be argumentative for the sake of being argumentative because that’s what makes you feel good.

          • taanegl@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            No, you’re saying irrelevant things because you’re being defensive, and then replying with an ad hominem, because you want to see your enemies defeated and driven before you - because you obviously lack raising. But I digress.

            Other places, like the EU, or say China, there are regulations about data security, whereas in the US, it’s the wild west, where companies can cut as much costs as they want and leak data like it’s a sport. The news every year is awash with leak news, and in most cases it comes from the US. So, yeah…

            Cope, yankie. Cope.

            • ravhall@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Everything you’re saying is irrelevant and off topic. See how that works? I can do it too.

              Yankee. Oh I got it, you’re an armchair communist.

              Tiananmen Square massacre was real buddy.

              • taanegl@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Your first reply was a whataboutism that tried to deflect the very obvious problem of US companies not taking security seriously, which has now devolved into you calling me a communist…?

                E everything you don’t like is a communist, isn’t it?

                Take your whataboutisms, ad hominems and the rest of your logical fallacies for a long walk off a short pier, because at this point I’m just blocking you.

                • ravhall@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Listing off all the reasons why you don’t like how I’m proving your wrong doesn’t make you right.

  • Uli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Social security number is the public key, now just issue everyone a private key. Boom. Fixed.