• AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry, hundreds of thousands of innocent children. This piece of paper says it’s impossible to stop paying for you to be murdered.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pretty much, that’s how “contractual obligations” work.

      In my state, we’ve been trying to get the state Public Employees Retirement System to divest from oil investments for a few decades now. The big problem is PERS is tied up with contractual obligations to provide a specific return on investment, a return which can’t be made if they dump fossil fuels:

      https://www.opb.org/article/2024/02/07/oregon-retirement-fund-carbon-neutrality/

      The folks supporting divestment think it’s like a light switch. “Well, just STOP!” and it doesn’t work that way.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It literally does just work that way. A piece of paper is a piece of paper. “But we won’t make as much money” is the part that holds it together. Contracts and laws in general are no more or less than a pretext to exercise class power. They’re broken at will in other contexts. The US was literally founded on it.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Tell me you don’t understand how a contract works without telling me you don’t understand how a contract works.

          There are legal liabilities for breaking a contract. It’s not that simple.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Tell me you don’t interact with people without a keyboard without telling me [useless repetition]. Fucking weirdo.

            Yes it is that simple. The law is, and only is, a mechanism for people with power to exercise that power under the veil of legitimacy. Ask any Indian tribe. Ask anyone with x amount of money attempting to litigate a contract with someone with 1000x amount of money.

            The reality of the system cannot be disputed without looking like a fucking joke.