In Texas, where doctors face up to 99 years of prison if convicted of performing an illegal abortion, medical and legal experts say the law is complicating decision-making around emergency pregnancy care.

Although the state law says termination of ectopic pregnancies is not considered abortion, the draconian penalties scare Texas doctors from treating those patients,

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Could have codified Roe, but keeping the filibuster intact was and will always be Senate Democrats’ highest priority.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Given that every Republican was against codification, it only takes having a few Democrats against it to block such a move. Even as a majority of Democrats were in favor, at no time was a majority of the Senate

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh stop making excuses for the Jim Crow Filibuster.

        Democrats had the seats and just enough no votes. Because they ALWAYS find the no votes.

        Children being forced to carry rapists’ offspring to term was the price that they were delighted to pay to keep their procedural excuse for inaction.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not “making execuses” for it — I’m pointing out the reality that the votes to end it haven’t been there, and how that happened.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            We gave Democrats the means to codify Roe.

            They chose to save the filibuster instead. They always do and always will.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re lumping the whole group together, which isn’t a good way to describe what happened when 50 Republicans wanted to block and somewhere around 3-5 Democrats out of 50 wanted to.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So you’re mostly interested in trolling and blaming Democrats as a group rather than electing enough willing Democrats to actually change things.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I’m done being lied to. There is no amount of Democrats that will change things. There are always just enough turncoats.