• RockyC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like this is a product looking for a market. Why would anyone ever trust that much data to something so fragile and easy to lose?

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use a 2tb (iirc) in my steam deck. Perfect application for that… Low rewrites, but totally expendable/replaceable data.

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      4k Drones, upgradeable phones, DLSR cameras, Data per weight etc.

      I own a 1tb ssd for my Steam Deck, literally 0 complaints, runs real fast, can’t feel any heat, never need to take it out other than if I’m factory resetting, it’s perfect! (though Valves next deck should just have a bigger ssd slot)

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They’re not for long term storage, they’re for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        if you want long term CCTV setup properly you should be using ethernet connected security cameras and then transmitting it back to a central server with a hdd always recording. It’s much more reliable and way more cost effective, just requires you running an ethernet cable to where the camera is.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            with ethernet the live feed is perfectly fine, and there is no remote downloading, it’s all streamed over the ethernet to a central box which handles everything from there. You might need some decode/encode capabilities, but to my understanding a lot of cameras will run multiple hardware encodes straight from the sensor over to the network already. So you probably don’t need much.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                personally i don’t have a cctv setup at the moment, so i can’t give any recommendations, but you’d be looking for POE capable cameras, and you’d need a POE enabled switch, and a computer connected to that switch in order to handle the incoming data, including software obviously. But it’s probably also dependent on the camera itself, nicer cameras are probably going to be more flexible.

                there are plenty of decent videos about homelab based CCTV setups out there if you’re looking to dig into them a bit more.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            yeah and at that point you’re probably not using a microsd card i would figure. You have a small computer in there already, might as well throw in an SSD or something.

            I guess if you needed the sheer capacity of 4TB you might use a micro sd, but you’re probably gambling more than you’re saving at that point.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d love them for my dash cam if they were affordable. My camera records in front and behind of my van in 4k, so that’s 90-100 gigs an hour. I leave it running as a surveillance camera when I’m parked, so just going to work and back in one day would use over a terabyte.

      • RockyC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why would you continuously record? Just record motion events and you won’t need a card that large at all, plus it will last a lot longer.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Filming 8K in a raw format maybe? (a lot of cameras only have an SD card slot, or only the sd card slot is fast enough to record raw at higher resolutions)

      You probably wouldn’t need to take it out of the camera either? so the form factor wouldn’t be major concern.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Also could be handy for smuggling banned movies/tv shows into authoritarian countries that block or outlaw unauthorised VPNs?

        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Though for the price these will retail for, would probably be easier to take more, smaller capacity cards…

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Also useful for devices where you want more storage but the device only has an SD card slot, or other slots are already occupied or sd card is just easier such as phones, Nintendo switch, steam deck, ultra light laptops, raspberry pi…