• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Trump has also fielded calls from donors who are upset about his running mate, JD Vance, and the Ohio senator’s previous comments including referring to Harris as a ‘childless cat lady.”

    Trump dismissed calls for Vance to be replaced on the ticket, but he also asked advisers if they were aware of the comments before Vance was selected.

    At the Hamptons dinner, Trump also downplayed the Democrats’ strategy of painting the GOP as “weird.”

    “Not about me. They’re saying that about JD,” Trump said, according to the Times.

    Oof. Incredible lack of self-awareness while also throwing your running mate under the bus lol

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oof. Incredible lack of self-awareness while also throwing your running mate under the bus lol

      Trump whipped a violent mob into a frenzy ready to actually lynch his last running mate. JD just needs to look at Pence to see what his own future holds.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they win, they are going to 25th Ammendment Trump. Then it will be Peter Thiels puppet in charge.

        Make no mistake about it.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          It would be funny to see Donald stroke out with rage from that. But it would be even funnier to see him stroke out with rage if he is defeated by a black woman. Also it wouldn’t be a fascist dictatorship, so I’d greatly prefer the latter.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        If by “genuinely thinks” you mean “is in denial”, sure. It’s not so much a matter of believing it or not, he just says what he wants to be true, simple as.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel like it was the kind of thing that worked better before articles were written about it and then literally every article and comment since then has included the word.

      Openly talking about it as a strategy feels like it’s turning it into our version of “Let’s Go Brandon” in a way.

      • machinin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        I thought the same thing, but it has sparked a huge discussion about if the word “weird” is a good label for Trump, Vance, and the most fervent MAGA supporters. When you’re fighting a cult, I have a feeling it works.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fair point, I see where you are coming from. This is definitely one of those “I’d rather be wrong” opinions on my end.