Intel breathes a sigh of relief as the spotlight moves off of them for a beat.

  • Except the AMD exploit requires ring 0 access and is almost irrelevant to most users, whereas the Intel issues are physically destroying people’s computers. The scale of the issues are utterly incomparable.

    I’m much more angry with whatever dipshit at AMD decided to revoke permission for ZLUDA, and that they haven’t yet been fired.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 month ago

    Funny. No. This is not remotely comparable to CPU’s crashing because of a lack of R&D and half ass quarter earnings profiteering culture’s lack of intelligent long term thinking. It is not remote accessible. This is just corporate psyops in an attempt to coverup their overwhelming neo feudal incompetence. If they had the staff and invested reasonably, the problems wouldn’t happen. Paint the world in shit to continue the claim that yours does not stink. Only idiots buy into that.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    Despite being potentially catastrophic, this issue is unlikely to impact regular people. That’s because in order to make full use of the flaw, hackers would already need deep access to an AMD-based PC or server.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 month ago

    It was really just a matter of time before someone figured a way to exploit those stupid deep management engines. It was so predictable.

    And each intel chip runs a minix system behind the scenes that I’m sure someone will soon find a way to play with if it’s not already compromised.

  • cpw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ll bet the Intel management engine is just as “vulnerable”. The only context this is likely a concern is large scale corpo deployments, without verified supply chains to the source. Love how the security researcher handwaves that there’s “plenty of existing exploits” that can be used to install the exploit into the SMM, without giving any suggestions of how.

  • aaaaace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    No way that Intel sat on this for years until they needed it for PR.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was troubled by how many times this article used the word “deep”. Also, what was the bit about the hack likely surviving a reinstall of the OS? Why in the world wouldn’t it if it’s a cpu bios firmware hack?