• Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    So not even any consideration of voting 3rd party? The concept that voting 3rd party is throwing away your vote is perpetuated by the 2 parties that want to stay in power. It’s easier to focus on one opponent, but the more people become comfortable with other options, the harder it is for the 2 parties to bullshit their way into power.

    • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m definitely not voting RFK Jr’s antivax ass. I mean he’s a Kennedy. Still an elite in power.

      Anyways, 3rd party candidates historically never have a chance. Ultimately if it were really my choice, the only parties we’d have are idk street parties. Because there’d be no government at all, or temporary governments when the need arises, or something more creative than the dumbass shit we have now.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you’re seriously suggesting voting third party you do not understand how voting works in the US. It is literally a wasted vote – even if 60% of the nation voted for a third party, the delegates are already pledged to one of the two main parties. The correct place to put that energy is in local elections and in a nationwide push for ranked choice or some other alternative to FPTP.

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      2 parties are the Nash Equilibrium of our system. We’d love to vote for other candidates, but we can’t beat the math.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        What is the math on how much your political opinion needs to be accounted for when you are an automatic lever pull for a given party?