The judge in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s upcoming trial over his handling of classified documents made two key errors in a June trial, one of which violated a fundamental constitutional right of the defendant and could have invalidated the proceedings, according to legal experts and a court transcript.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. This article is appealing to your hate for a Trump appointee who shouldn’t be in this position. What information are you getting that you didn’t already know. She’s a bad judge. Period. But by angering readers they create clicks and get eyeballs. $. I’m not saying it’s not news and you shouldn’t pay attention. I’m just trying to make people more aware of how they interact with the news.

        • archiotterpup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          The enlightened centrism is suffocating.

          The article is driving traffic. That doesn’t change the fact she fucked up her job.

          You’re just muddying the waters by shifting the discussion away from her actions to how they’re reported.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The enlightened centrism is suffocating.

            Look at my post history.

            The article is driving traffic. That doesn’t change the fact she fucked up her job.

            True.

            You’re just muddying the waters by shifting the discussion away from her actions to how they’re reported.

            I am criticizing the media. It’s sad that you don’t have the ability to understand that media influences you. And when someone points it out, your reaction is to shit on them for trying to make you aware. And I’m the bad guy?

            • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              OK so what’s your point here then, about the facts regarding Aileen Cannon? Are you actually arguing any points or just making ad hominem attacks?

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your post history does not matter. And I can even agree with you on the media in general. But that really doesn’t matter in this case. Canon should not be a judge in any court. The same could be said for many others. But they’re coverage and characterization of Canon is important with regards to this historic and important case that she will be overseeing. Likely to all of our deficit. Immediate and everyone is right to raise a stink about her. She’s already shown that she cannot be fair impartial or deliver Justice. Regardless of whether or not we agree with the media.