~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO – you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it’s not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    Out of principle, I refuse to pretend I am not browsing with Firefox. 🦊❤️✊ Let website statistics show! And I will boycott sites that break due to not testing on multiple browsers!

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I thought like that until youtube started intentionally slowing firefox identifying clients. As soon as I changed my user-agent to match chrome’s the speed was back to normal.

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lol I blocked all but essential JS on YouTube with NoScript and never faced any problems at all. Videos load just fine without extra penalties.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      That works until it’s your bank or credit card website. I cannot use Capital One’s (CC) “pay bill” any longer.