• RocketSocket@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why have I never heard discussion of different rates for non-residents? State parks do it. I don’t think it’s nationalistic to say that if you don’t pay taxes towards the park, you should pay more to visit it. Especially considering that flights to get there are an order of magnitude more expensive than entry fees, the parks should be making some of that money.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is quite commonly done in many places, but it usually does nothing against tourists crowding out locals and once operators notice they can raise prices a lot without much difference in visitor numbers, things tend to get more expensive for everyone.

      • RocketSocket@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        My counterpoint is even if it doesn’t reduce crowds, at least the parks will be making 20x more revenue, so they can improve infrastructure to handle the crowds.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, but this isn’t just a problem for national parks.

    Holiday planning seems to boil down for most people to typing “location must see” into Google, which leads them all to the same three heavily SEO optimized travel blogs, with the same few locations everyone then tries to go to.

  • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Colorado has a bunch of examples of this. Rocky Mountain National Park, like they mention in this post, has a timed entry permit system. Mt. Quandary has parking permits in the summer. The Four Pass Loop needs permits. Etc. There are places that need to get on a system like that, like the Grays and Torreys trailhead that just had a huge ticketing and towing operation because of all the illegal parking.

    It’s a good problem to have that so many people want to go outside and have fun, but it’s still a problem. It’s kind of nice that most tourists get funneled to National Parks and leave the “local spots” alone, but those get overrun, too. I’ve taken to just doing class 2+ 13ers and only going to popular spots in the cold and snow to avoid the crowds. Summiting a mountain while dealing with traffic jams and bluetooth speakers, then seeing 20+ people sitting around up top just isn’t how I want to spend my free time.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    My experience is that if you can get a mile from asphalt or concrete then all of this melts away. I’ve been on a beach with no other person, horizon to horizon (2mi hike to the beach). I once walked a trail in possibly the most crowded part of the most crowded park (Cades Cove) and the only encounter my group had was with a copperhead snake.

    Yea, but anything you can drive up to is going to be a disaster.