Generally, the lens I’ve come to criticise any/all fediverse projects is how well they foster community building. One reason why I like and “advocate” for the lemmy/threadiverse side of things is precisely because of this and how the centrality of the community/sub/group is a good way of organising social media (IMO).

Also, because of that, I recently came to be skeptical of the effects that the “All” feed can have. I didn’t even realise that people relied mostly on the All feed until recently.

I think I’ve reached the point now of being against it (at least tentatively). I know, it’s a staple and there’s no way it’s going away. And I know it’s useful.

But thinking about the feature set, through the community building lens, I think it’d be fair to say that things are out of balance: they don’t promote community building enough while also providing the All feed which dissolves community building.

Not really a criticism of the developers … AFAIU, the All feed is easier to implement than any other community building feature … and it’s expected from reddit (though it isn’t normal on forums AFAICT, which is maybe worth considering for anyone happy to reassess what about reddit is retained and what isn’t).

But still, I can imagine a platform that is more focused on communities:

  • Community explorer tool built in.
    • Could even be a substitute for an All feed … where you can browse through various communities you don’t know about and see what they’ve posted recently
  • Multi-communities (long time coming by now for many I’d say)
    • Could even be part of the community explorer tool where you can create on-the-fly multi-communities to see their posts in a temporary feed
  • Private and local only communities (already here on lemmy and coming for private communities)
  • Post visibility options for Public communities (IE, posts that opt-in private)
  • More flexible notifications for various things/events that happen within a community
  • Wikis
  • Chat interface
    • I’m thinking this is pretty viable given that Lemmy used to use a web-socket auto-updating design … add that to the flat chat view and you’ve got a chat room. There are resource issues, so limiting them to one per community or 6hrs per week per community or something would probably be necessary.

A possibly interesting and frustrating aspect of all of these suggestions/ideas above is I can see their federation being problematic or difficult … which raises the issue of whether there’s serious tension between platform design and protocol capabilities.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are many communities I would have no interest in participating actively, but that I still like to hear about when something big happens. The all feed kinda gives me that sort of experience.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m aware and don’t challenge this utility. Just questioning the balance.

      And by implication raising the possibility that with more community features the All feed would become redundant and could then be removed.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    ALL generates a fair bit of traffic, but the quality of that traffic tends to be beyond shit. It would be nice to be able to set replies of posts to subscribers only.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would be nice to be able to set replies of posts to subscribers only.

      Yea … and this is the kind of antagonism I’m trying to on the table. If it becomes true that features for putting walls between a community and the “All” feed are useful and desirable … and we don’t even have those features, then the balance is surely off, and working toward a situation where we can take the All feed down a worthwhile goal.

      Though, whether there’s an All or not … post interaction and visibility controls for any public communities could be quite nice.

      • Interstellar_1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, it’s just it’s own implementation, it lets you view a list of communities I think.

        • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yea cool. A basic feature that fetches communities from any/all instances makes sense. But by “explorer”, I was thinking of something richer like the lemmyverse explorer page that can give you activity numbers and maybe even a quick preview of the current feed from the community.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think a significant issue here is that Reddit is not built for fostering communities, and things that mimic Reddit will not foster them, either. The whole model is built around an endless number of very large, single subject discussion spaces with functionally no globally consistent moderation or oversight.

    This is a model of content categorization and filtering for individual consumption, not community building. Lemmy “communities” are just content tags, they’re not real community spaces. They’re never going to encourage the kind of tight knit spaces with idiosyncratic customs, rituals, and rules that actual vommunities have. They’re never going to let you get to know others because “off topic” discussions are meant to be had in entirely different spaces.

    Reddit and reddit-like services are about content creation and delivery, noy community. Thatms baked into the form.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I see that for sure. Fediverse platforms don’t have to be locked in to mimicking big platforms though. User expectations and habits, frankly, can be a problem with this. Some are interested in experimentation. But if enough are kinda “conservative” about what they want, the devs will naturally not want to take risks.