• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have all of the preferences you criticize and that leaves me with… Several options… that I actually would want to live in. And shockingly , my preferences don’t absolutely dictate where I live because I understand nothing is perfect. It’s a big country and world. Let people have preferences without being weird about it

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You realize this is a comment thread that is responding to the OP’s “starter pack” image, right? The entire premise of the image is: I have extremely bounded preferences, but it’s unfair I can’t buy a house for 200K based on those preferences.

      Did you buy the home you currently own in a location that satisfied these preferences for 200K or less? Or are you just responding to my response and not the image to which I was responding?

      I have no problem with people having exceptionally limiting preferences, but it seems silly to then complain about the lack (or cost) of those very limited options.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t own a home and I’ll keep it that way unless there’s a good investment opportunity.

        I think you’re missing the point of the post. They’re making fun of people who think a $200K home is great because they’ve gotta ignore that they live in a shit hole to get that price