• experbia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deprivatize the aerospace industry. imagine the boon to the American economy if these failing, debt-ridden, dysfunctional aerospace manufacturers and airlines were replaced by a massive jobs program with the goal of optimizing air travel safety, affordability, and access. we’re a big country. we could massively benefit from an aeronautical empire that gives any person safe, enjoyable 30 dollar flights, coast to coast.

    (edit, oops, forgot a prefix. wow)

    • itslilith
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Better yet, reduce reliance on domestic air travel by building a modern high-speed rail network

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        In my opinion, HSR is a supplement, not a replacement. Flying is still fast and in some cases easier to get to than rail.

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      If any politician would run this on a platform I’d make a bingo game of the canned responses you’d see all over the “free thinker” side of social media.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          No. If flights are dirt cheap, people will kill this planet using them. It’s not about the price, it’s about the amount (& type) of energy used to accomplish transportation.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            If flights are dirt cheap

            HSR is generally more convenient and less expensive than air travel, thanks to the ability to run trains directly out of the center of major cities while airports are flung to the outskirts. If you’ve got the choice between a $30 plane + hours of driving and TSA and boarding and landing, or a straight shot to your train station and then $30 to pop on the next one that’s scheduled to leave, its an easy choice.

            it’s about the amount (& type) of energy used to accomplish transportation.

            Its also about speed and convenience. We’ve made train travel painfully obtuse. Other countries don’t do it this way, so people spend far less time in the air.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              My apologies, when you referred to HSR, especially considering the context of Boeing, my brain deciphered that as “health & safety regulations”. I take it you are talking about a train system operator / railway network? And yes, train network in the US sucks compared to Europe, if I may say so as a European. But also here (Germany), it is painfully expensive - and I want to lynch some responsible politicians for making train tickets more expensive than regular flights for even short distances…