“Half of the Israeli public is no longer in favor of the war,” one friend told me Saturday night as we witnessed thousands of Israelis take to the streets to protest the Israeli government under the slogan, “Elections Now.” “Yes, but the other half is all-in, and REALLY in favor,” responded his wife. “And they are the more powerful group.”

She, of course, is right. For months, reports of torture and rape have emerged from Israel’s military base turned torture camp, Sde Teiman, where Israel has imprisoned thousands of Palestinians without charge. I wrote about it in a previous diary earlier this month. Palestinians who have emerged from this torture camp refer to it as the “slaughterhouse” with horrendous tales of torture, rape, abuse, and sleep deprivation being meted out by Israeli prison guards. Nearly 30 Palestinians have died while in Sde Teiman and other prisons, according to the information provided to date.

And while the precise chain of events is unclear, what we do know is that the Israeli military advocate general decided to dispatch the military police to question nine Israeli soldiers on suspicion of gang-raping and sodomizing a Palestinian man from Gaza at Sde Teiman. The man was rushed to the hospital where he exhibited signs of rape, including a ruptured bowel and broken ribs. It would be a mistake to simply think that Israel’s actions in prisons like Sde Teiman came only after October. Since becoming Israel’s national security minister in 2022, ultranationalist Itamar Ben Gvir has made prisons his target, with him authorizing abuse against Palestinians. He has also called for the death penalty to solve problems of overcrowding.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        yes, that’s a lot less loaded headline.

        did you think you were delivering some sick burn, but shot yourself in your own leg instead? 😆

        Summary

        The Zeteo article uses highly emotional and critical language, aiming to evoke a strong emotional response from the reader, particularly outrage and condemnation towards Israeli actions and the societal response.

        The CBS News article maintains a more neutral and factual tone, focusing on presenting a balanced view of the events and reactions, thus aiming to inform rather than to emotionally charge the reader.

        Both articles discuss deeply disturbing events, but they differ significantly in their approach to tone and emotional engagement.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe being biased against rape and torture is a good thing ¯\(ツ)/¯. Many newspapers used neutral and “objective” language in the 1800s when covering the lynching of black people, and it’s hypothesized that this helped normalize the practice. There are many valid criticisms against “journalistic objectivity.”

          Also, be mindful that ChatGPT is intentionally biased through training data selection, RLHF, and many guardrails.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Maybe being biased against rape and torture is a good thing ¯(ツ)/¯

            being biased in the news is never good thing. if you are biased, you are doing propaganda, not the news.

            There are many valid criticisms against “journalistic objectivity.”

            no, there are not. not unless you want to come up with some stupid joke like “objectivity means 5 minutes for hitler and 5 minutes for jew”, which, obviously, no sane person thinks.

            objectivity means you bring, to the best of your ability, all relevant facts and let the reader draw their own conclusion instead of trying to manipulate them.

            it is the difference between news and said propaganda.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            not just the headline, the whole article. and your hysterical one liner is not going to change that 😂

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No sick burn was intended.

          Regardless of whether you think an emotive or a dispassionate tone is more appropriate for this particular story, the facts contained in both articles remain the same, do they not?

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            the facts contained in both articles remain the same, do they not

            yes, i am not disputing the facts.

            edit:

            so it turned out that the facts are not, in fact, the same 😂

            this is propaganda - notice how “the stick” became “the explosive”, which is pretty ludicrous manipulation.

            and that is why i would never read the zeteo article behind the headline, haven’t i got into this discussion.

            zeteo:

            “Is inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person legitimate?” Likud Knesset member Hanoch Milvetsky responded with what has been the position of the right (more than 50% of the Knesset, remember): “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas commando], everything is legitimate.”

            cbs:

            Lawmaker Hanoch Milwidsky was asked as he defended the alleged abuse whether it was legitimate, “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum?”

            “Yes!” he shouted in reply to his fellow parliamentarian. “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”


            original:

            the problem is you can make the same loaded headline about october 7 attack, and it doesn’t serve its purpose of sharing the facts, because most of potential readers will dismiss it right when finishing the headline.

            i do want to believe that majority of the israeli society does not riot for a right to rape prisoners and as a person living 3000 km from the conflict, being fed emotional propaganda from both sides doesn’t make the job of making the opinion easier.

            this is propaganda - notice how “the stick” became “the explosive”, which is pretty ludicrous manipulation.

            and that is why i would never read the zeteo article behind the headline, haven’t i got into this discussion.

            zeteo:

            “Is inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person legitimate?” Likud Knesset member Hanoch Milvetsky responded with what has been the position of the right (more than 50% of the Knesset, remember): “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas commando], everything is legitimate.”

            cbs:

            Lawmaker Hanoch Milwidsky was asked as he defended the alleged abuse whether it was legitimate, “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum?”

            “Yes!” he shouted in reply to his fellow parliamentarian. “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”

            • aleph@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I disagree – I think there is definitely room for this more impassioned/personal style of reporting as long as the facts being reported are accurate, especially with this conflict in particular. After all, the headline is not misleading – people literally attacked military bases in defense of the right of IDF soldiers to rape and torture Palestinian detainees with impunity. That happened.

              If you prefer the more dispassionate, passive-voice-using, equivocating language about what is going on in Israel/Palestine right now, you have almost the entire rest of the Western news media to choose from.

              • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think there is definitely room for this more impassioned/personal style of reporting as long as the facts being reported are accurate

                you are thinking of propaganda.

                thre isn’t room for passion in news, because passion clouds judgement and that stands in a way of accuracy.

                you can be passionate about a subject, but it can’t affect your choice of facts or adjectives you use to emotionally manipulate the reader - because then you are simply not trustworthy and its even counterproductive to your goal, which is to share information about the subject of your passion.

                • aleph@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The idea that propaganda cannot be propaganda if it is delivered in a dry, objective tone is nonsensical.

                  The Israel/Palestine conflict is a great example of this - especially in the US. Anyone who has closely watched the mainstream news media cover the situation in Gaza, or the college protests that sprung up as a result, has witnessed consent for Israel’s war being manufactured in front of their very eyes, along with the vilification of anyone who stands opposed to it. The fact that it is delivered by seemingly professional journalists in a somber, even tone has no bearing whatsoever on how accurately it describes reality.

                  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    The idea that propaganda cannot be propaganda if it is delivered in a dry, objective tone is nonsensical.

                    i am talking about exact opposite problem.

                    i am talking about when you deliver mix of information in highly emotional and manipulative tone, but claim it to be news.

                    dry, objective tone is indeed not the assurance of being good news, but it is one of the qualifying conditions.

                    this is propaganda - notice how “the stick” became “the explosive”, which is pretty ludicrous manipulation.

                    and that is why i would never read the zeteo article behind the headline, haven’t i got into this discussion.


                    zeteo:

                    “Is inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person legitimate?” Likud Knesset member Hanoch Milvetsky responded with what has been the position of the right (more than 50% of the Knesset, remember): “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas commando], everything is legitimate.”

                    cbs:

                    Lawmaker Hanoch Milwidsky was asked as he defended the alleged abuse whether it was legitimate, “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum?”

                    “Yes!” he shouted in reply to his fellow parliamentarian. “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”


                • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  You have a completely imaginary concept of how news works. It’s always biased. It’s always propaganda. Your “neutral tone” is just a propaganda tool of hegemony.

                  The best we can hope for is that the news is biased against rape, genocide, etc. Even though most often it is not.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              i do want to believe that majority of the israeli society does not riot for a right to rape prisoners and as a person living 3000 km from the conflict, being fed emotional propaganda from both sides doesn’t make the job of making the opinion easier.

              Oh so we need to let you remain delusional so you can live in comfort while people are raped and genocided nearby?

            • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Because that’s the quote from the lawmaker asking the question. If they didn’t quote him exactly they’d be lying.

              Even now, as a wider war with Hezbollah and Iran looms, Israel remains deeply divided over an incident that feels a lot like the US torture abuse scandal in Abu Ghraib and the January 6 riot rolled into one. Ahmad Tibi, a member of the Knesset (MK) from an Arab political party, asked during a parliamentary debate over the abuses at Sde Teiman if “inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person [is] legitimate.” In response, Hanoch Milvetsky — a member from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party — said that when it came to Hamas commandos, “everything is legitimate.”

              https://www.vox.com/politics/364343/israel-riot-military-base-sde-touman-torture-member-knesset

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          odds are it will be because they lie.

          notice how “the stick” became “the explosive”, which is pretty ludicrous manipulation.

          zeteo:

          “Is inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person legitimate?” Likud Knesset member Hanoch Milvetsky responded with what has been the position of the right (more than 50% of the Knesset, remember): “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas commando], everything is legitimate.”

          cbs:

          Lawmaker Hanoch Milwidsky was asked as he defended the alleged abuse whether it was legitimate, “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum?”

          “Yes!” he shouted in reply to his fellow parliamentarian. “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because that’s the quote from the lawmaker asking the question. If they didn’t quote him exactly they’d be lying.

            Even now, as a wider war with Hezbollah and Iran looms, Israel remains deeply divided over an incident that feels a lot like the US torture abuse scandal in Abu Ghraib and the January 6 riot rolled into one. Ahmad Tibi, a member of the Knesset (MK) from an Arab political party, asked during a parliamentary debate over the abuses at Sde Teiman if “inserting an explosive into the rectum of a person [is] legitimate.” In response, Hanoch Milvetsky — a member from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party — said that when it came to Hamas commandos, “everything is legitimate.”

            https://www.vox.com/politics/364343/israel-riot-military-base-sde-touman-torture-member-knesset