lukenamop@lemmy.worldM to Strange Planet by Nathan W. Pyle@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agologicallemmy.worldimagemessage-square548fedilinkarrow-up12.93K
arrow-up12.93Kimagelogicallemmy.worldlukenamop@lemmy.worldM to Strange Planet by Nathan W. Pyle@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square548fedilink
minus-squareAlien Surfer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoBrilliant. Now if we only used base 12 numbering system, things would be even easier to halve.
minus-squareTripleZ@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoWhy stop at base 12. Let’s go base-60. Divisible by 2,3,4,5 and 6.
minus-squareSneezycat@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAll-in, let’s do base 210. Divisible by 2, 3, 5 and 7, covering all the small primes. And we can do even better: base-420 which is also divisible by 4 and a funnier number.
minus-squarethemeatbridge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoBase 12 is better than base 10, but base 16, aka Hexadecimal is better still.
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoBase 16 is only divisible by a single prime, just a fancy name for base 2.
Brilliant. Now if we only used base 12 numbering system, things would be even easier to halve.
Why stop at base 12. Let’s go base-60. Divisible by 2,3,4,5 and 6.
All-in, let’s do base 210. Divisible by 2, 3, 5 and 7, covering all the small primes.
And we can do even better: base-420 which is also divisible by 4 and a funnier number.
Base 12 is better than base 10, but base 16, aka Hexadecimal is better still.
Why? (genuine question)
Base 16 is only divisible by a single prime, just a fancy name for base 2.