return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 个月前In Tim Walz, Democrats see a potential VP pick who can shore up the 'blue wall'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up173
arrow-up173external-linkIn Tim Walz, Democrats see a potential VP pick who can shore up the 'blue wall'www.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 个月前message-square32fedilink
minus-squareFredselfish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 个月前Want someone young not another old white man. Why not a female VP?
minus-squarePythagreousTitties@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 个月前I care more about if they’re qualified than what color or gender they are.
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Literally anyone nominated will be “qualified”. We have plentiful qualified options in any color and gender combination. Implying otherwise is just a dogwhistle from the right to say “why not white male, they’re better”.
minus-squarePythagreousTitties@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 个月前Trump and Vance are absolutely not qualified.
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前*sigh* For the Democrats. The party we’re talking about right now. JFC.
minus-squarePythagreousTitties@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 个月前Point is, just being nominated does not qualify anyone if they’re a terrible pick.
Why?
Want someone young not another old white man. Why not a female VP?
I care more about if they’re qualified than what color or gender they are.
Literally anyone nominated will be “qualified”. We have plentiful qualified options in any color and gender combination. Implying otherwise is just a dogwhistle from the right to say “why not white male, they’re better”.
Trump and Vance are absolutely not qualified.
*sigh* For the Democrats. The party we’re talking about right now. JFC.
Point is, just being nominated does not qualify anyone if they’re a terrible pick.