• humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, actually having the coefficient of 1.4-1.7 is OK: look at France or Germany: they had these values for nearly 40 years and the population only increases

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Stewart pretty much destroyed his career the first time. He went from being a pretty well-respected CNN talking head to a corporate shill with a primetime slot on FOX to now being a blatant autocratic toadie and billionaires lapdog on a failed social media network.

                  As someone who saw the episode of Crossfire when it aired, it’s been an interesting fall.

            • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Even if A implies B in a classic logic sense, having A in mind doesn’t mean that one has B. If that wasn’t the case, no propaganda machine would work.

              Furthermore, concern about population decline could come from a legit fear that there won’t be enough young people to fuel capitalism machine when one’s old , or that reproduction decline has a good correlation coefficient with upcoming wars.