• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Soviets invaded Afghanistan, a bordering country, after the USA had armed radical theocratic militias with modern weapons. And whatever they did in Afghanistan pales in comparison with US actions in non-neighboring Vietnam. If you want to see the true impact of the USSR in central-asian countries vs that of the west, why don’t you compare the Human Development Index of Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan (ex-Soviet republics) to that of Pakistan (ex-English colony).

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s not a “whose worse” competition, but you tankies can’t seem to accept that countries other than the us also do and did bad shit. It’s all whataboutism with you.

      Nobody in this thread is denying what the us has done, nor celebrating it. But keep on telling us what a nice guy Stalin was!

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        but you tankies

        There we go, the generic word to refer to everyone who doesn’t uncritically peddle anti-communist discourse.

        you tankies can’t seem to accept that countries other than the us also do and did bad shit.

        But keep on telling us what a nice guy Stalin was!

        I’m not a Stalinist. The great terror was terrible, unjustified, and overall a disaster. The collectivisation policy led to chaos and hunger. The democratic functioning of Soviets was seriously undermined. It’s just, as much as you probably don’t consider that the whole existence of the UK as a country is illegitimate as a consequence of its colonialist history, I don’t consider that the USSR as a whole should have been dismantled, and I consider that its overall impact on the world was positive, especially comparing it to what was before and to what came after.