wnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agoSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up157file-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up157external-linkSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comwnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squareNecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI’ve heard that fusion reactors become slightly more viable with room temperature superconductors, is that true or no?
minus-squareHumbleHobo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.
I’ve heard that fusion reactors become slightly more viable with room temperature superconductors, is that true or no?
I think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.