• Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kamala Harris is getting support from every major Democratic constituency — from progressives like Sen. Elizabeth Warren to establishment types like Hillary Clinton to moderates like Rep. Josh Gottheimer. There is no real opening for a rival.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    She has zero political experience, biggest claim is being attached to Oprah, and several claims of toxic environment which led to her campaign manager leaving. She doesn’t have a good poll turnout. Zero chance.

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      several claims of toxic environment which led to her campaign manager leaving

      They say that about every female politician, including Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris.

      Heaven forbid that a woman raise her voice sometimes.

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Just google “politician abusive to staff” and count how many women pop up on the first page of results.

          No one cares if a man raises his voice to his staff. When a woman does it, it becomes tabloid and blog fodder.

          Men particularly feel indignant if a female boss chastises them.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Marianne, you got tarred as a nutjob in 2020. That’s not going away, no matter how unfair it may be.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      I love how up until yesterday, they posted about every poll like it was decree, and today, polls be damned, Oprah’s spiritual advisor needs a shot.

      Honestly though, I do hope it’s an open convention, even though Harris looks like she’s got backing from all angles.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh, Williamson can try. I don’t begrudge her. She’s just not gonna win because she’s seen as the nutjob and has been since 2020.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah she kinda cray cray.

            I’ll be blunt: I don’t want someone who thinks “crystal energy fields” are a thing anywhere near the nuclear football. It was harrowing enough having the orange nutjob in charge of it for 4 years.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              She says she’s never even owned a crystal, and the whole “crystal lady” thing is a media smear.

              None of her books say anything about crystals.

              • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                Ok, I’ll be more blunt:

                I don’t think a “spiritual advisor” has appropriate or pertinent experience to lead anything outside of a spiritual or religious organization.

                • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s not the only thing on her résumé. Back in the ‘80s, she formed a charity for people with AIDS called Project Angel Food, and a lot of her support today comes from gay men who remember Project Angel Food.

                  Project Angel Food is still running today, but Williamson is no longer involved.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    There needs to be an open convention. NO one voted for Harris as President, assuming the job is hers is usurping the democratic election process. I could have sworn we were told we need to elect a democrat to preserve democracy

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing is, she’s as close as you can get to an elected candidate in this circumstance. An “open” convention doesn’t mean everyone gets to vote, it means the relatively smaller set of die hard party members get to ignore their primary voters and decide what they want to do.

      The only presidential candidate that won the votes was Biden. He then chose Harris as a running mate, which meant the general population voted for her to be the president if a man in his 80s has to step down.

      Yes might have been better for him to have stepped aside before the primaries, but he we are, with the VP being the only choice people plausibly got to vote on.

    • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You miss the part where many democrats are so terrified of the image that has been painted of Trump that they would vote for a resurrected Hitler if they were told he was wearing a blue button.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 months ago

            One of these two will have power in November. That is reality. The democrats are the lesser of two evils. People living in reality don’t have the luxury of choosing non-existent options, and have to pick from what is possible.

        • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          How interesting. So when trump tells you he will fight for democracy, you believe him. What a confusing world you must be living in.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s not what I said, and don’t put words in my mouth.

            It’s not what he says he’ll do, it’s what he says he is. He is a petty dictator who can’t stomach dissent or disagreement who will happily use anyone to further his own ends, and will happily take whatever interpretation of reality puts him on top, even if it means intentionally misreading and misinterpreting things.

            But I don’t have to tell you that. You seem to be quite well-versed in that technique yourself.

      • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        With one hand your ignorance can cover the sky. How impressive! Now talk to me about EMTALA, or Griswold, or Obergefell—and we’re not even touching the thrilling possibilities of executive action. People who are paying attention (and aren’t straight white men devoid of empathy) are taking this seriously. Maybe you should investigate why.

        • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The side calling 100k+ dead foreign brown kids a “single issue” is so much more empathetic than the evil white man pointing out how awful it is. Cirque du soleil may have an opening for their new mental themed acrobatics show if you are interested.

          • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay. What is your plan to stop it? Omit the magic beans. I have allergies.

            Lay it out step by step.

            • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              As soon as they started using our bombs and tax money to blow up safety camps for displaced citizens, we should have quit giving them everything they asked for. If we must, we should be lending them money, not straight giving them billions in free bombs. That would be the simplest start. It is clear they are way beyond selPalestine.

              I find it very hard to believe that the most peaceful president in nearly everyone’s lifetimes is going to go nuking palestine. I know there’s a bunch of people who are convinced he is, I just don’t buy it.

              • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                This is not a plan.

                We know what is happening in Palestine is an atrocity. Who stops the sale of arms and bombs. How do we get them into office? Outline how this works practically. What levers of power are we throwing to get the result we want? Be specific.

                Just saying because we should stop selling is cheap. 1/3 of the cointry doesn’t care, another 1/3 likes the genocide. How do we outmaneuver them?

                Because not voting blue, and not having anything more concrete than ‘because we shouldn’t’ doesn’t save a single Palestinian but comes with the doorprize of 10 year olds forced to have their rapist’s baby, and open season on trans people, blank checks to corpos, the end of public schools, etc. Performative morality is a blight.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            than the evil white man pointing out how awful it is

            Why are you lying? Trump’s position on Israel is that it should “finish the job” [of genociding the Palestinians].

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cool. Let’s have an open convention then.

        I’m fine with Harris winning at the convention - I’m not fine with the DNC coronating her beforehand.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, I agree. And given Harris’ statement about wanting to win the nomination, I think that’s where it’s going.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This just in… Delusional candidate is… still delusional.

    The only candidacy that could be stopped by medication in the correct doses.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Unless there’s a plan to hold fifty primary votes between Harris and Williamson and anyone else in the next few weeks, pass. I think Marianne would make a great president, but I don’t like party nominees being chosen by delegates at the convention at the last second, it’s not democratic.

    Of course, there is a lot about the last three Democratic primaries that weren’t democratic, but at this point that’s a problem for 2028.

    e; actually, it’s probably a problem for 2026