• Glifted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think AOC isn’t old enough to be VP. I don’t say that as a matter of opinion. I think you have to be at least 40

    Edit: it’s actually 35, but AOC is 34 so I was partially correct

    However I think the relevant language is:

    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    So maybe it’s okay for VP

    • SqueakyBeaver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      AOC’s birthday is this October, so I believe she would be eligible just in time lol

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      She’ll be old enough to be POTUS by inauguration.

      So, she’s probably old enough to be VPOTUS…

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Irrelevant. The Democrats would never put a progressive in a position where they could be president. They’ll probably go for a centrist like Shapiro or a corporate Dem like Newsom. I’m hoping that they’ll go with Whitmer but they’ll probably shy away from a two woman ticket.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s relevant to the question of if she’s old enough, which is a fair question given she’s on the cusp. Even if only theoretically.