• braindefragger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t see it that way at all. This seems like a great way to increase their votes. It’s not like they are going to lose voters who were going to vote Biden to begin with.

        • braindefragger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s never about those that were going to vote for Biden anyways. It’s always been about the undecided voters.

          Right. That’s obviously the whole point.

      • ECB@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah the reality is that Biden was 95% going to lose to Trump. Picking a new person is usially a huge risk, but in this case there wasn’t much to lose.

        As things stand right now, Trumps chances of winning just went down a bit. Worst case, they pick someone terrible with similar (non-)chances to Biden. Best case, they pick someone who wins.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve 100% thought through this. Harris takes over the Biden / Harris campaign war chest, and if Biden drops out now, the party can go into the align around Harris before the convention. And now we have 3+ months to get people hyped about not voting for an old white dude.

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’ve posted this 5 times in this thread in the last 20 minutes. Take a moment to read your own link…

          Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

        • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          From the article you linked to:

          Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Republicans are going to play every trick in the book, legal, moral, ethical or not. They will shout it at the rallies, take every opportunity to stir up shit on television (with help from Koch and Sinclair owned media) and you will hear every reason why the democratic nominee cannot be President. If Democrats find someone with a squeaky clean record and the Republicans can’t find anything truthful, they’ll fabricate it with ease. “Kamala Harris ate a moldy bagel in 2018 therefore she can’t be president.”

          The one advantage Democrats have at this very second, is that Republicans and Trump can’t use the media machine to pre-emptively smear any one person, since nobody knows who the nominee will be yet. Use this opportunity well and combat the “ahh confusion, somehow only Trump makes sense” narrative that will be sure to be floated.