• Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who Googled arch linux for dummies and realized even that was too complicated and then proceeded to install an arch based distro just to get AUR.

    • Tubbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      After having distro hopped for over 10 years ive settled on manjaro xfce and been happily running it for roughly five years now. It works very well out of the box, comes with working support for nvidia and steam being preinstalled. It strikes a very good balance between latest bleeding edge and just works, a position where it is bound to sometimes make some mistakes. But I’ve never noticed any issues. I can fully recommend it, it seems like most people that give it hate comes from memes or have never tried it themselves

      • NateSwift@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re happy with it there isn’t one.

        Lots of people see it as a handful of config options of Arch with its own less stable package repository

      • SyJ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has massive stability options and the support from the devs is poor, one of them openly said that if users can’t fix their broken systems they shouldn’t update them.

    • Sharp312@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used it for a while, never had an issue. im on base arch now but ngl manjaro had the best gnome implementation I’ve ever seen

    • Spiracle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was an often-recommended distro a couple of years ago. When SteamOS 3 was on the horizon, some people recommended it as probably the closest to SteamOS 3 on the market. Now, I haven’t bothered uninstalling it on my old computer yet.