Some time ago, I noticed that youtube comments are copied without emojis, thought nothing of that - bugs happen - but today I finally decided to find out why and what the hell is even this.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s really interesting, I didn’t realise the problem was that bad. I did the quiz at the bottom, tried to answer honestly and only got 5 out of 14 correct.

      • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got 7 and even then that’s only because half way through I began to notice a theme on the really obscure ones with long names.

        These are ridiculous, they often bear no resemblance at all to their supposed meaning wtf? Slanted closed eyes with steam coming out the nostrils isn’t anger it’s… “Triumph”!?

          • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Mind you, emoji were created in Japan, so a lot of the original ones can be weird to us due to cultural differences.

        • Concetta
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Would love to see actual use vs intented use on that one lol.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      When they look different people interpret them differently.

      Ah, paralinguistic communication is always like this. Once you change the symbol ever so slightly, the meaning being conveyed also changes.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess that makes more sense now that I see an example. I just can’t fathom how any Apple artist thought they made a “grinning face with smiling eyes” when they looked at that image. It’s “grimacing face with smiling eyes” very obviously. I thought all representations were like the others in this example - they all look like a “grinning face with smiling eyes”. They look different but it doesn’t matter.

      I still think though that if there weren’t obvious mistakes like this, it doesn’t matter how the “grinning face with smiling eyes” exactly looks, or any other emoji for that matter.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s clearly another way to wall the apple garden further, to the point where you don’t get to communicate in an effective way unless you both have an iPhone.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s interesting. I wonder how true that still is today, given the study was done in 2016. The study also pointed out that even on the same platform, people on average interpreted the same emojis differently. I’d be interested in an updated study conducted among younger Gen Z to see if being completely raised in the digital age has created various emoji languages, especially across cultures (which they mention they wanted to do at the end of the article as well).