• imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    You don’t think there were people asking. “How did he even get on the roof? Did he buy a ladder or was there already One there? Why was there one already there?”

    Have you been in the comment sections of any of these?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Explaining how he did get on the roof is one thing. Waste everyone’s time enumerating other ways he didn’t use is another.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think such people don’t need to be catered to. What he did not bring to his assassination attempt is not in any way relevant.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah we get it, you’re not creative enough to think of anything. Yeah he bought a ladder and left it at another building to make it seem like something else maybe. I’m sure you can think of a couple dozen situations easily yourself.

            Common tactic dude. Do you really need diversions explained to you….?

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Why’s that important? The thing is you need to follow every possible lead, which is real, which is diversion, you don’t know till you check.

                Take a break from the internet today dude, you’re already on the downswing.

                I gave you an example, I’m not expanding the story, I’m sorry you can’t comprehend that.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  When did this become about investigators following leads? This was about ABC reporting a detail that added nothing important to the story and the lack of it would have taken nothing important from the story.

                  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Investigators aren’t perfect, and yeah you don’t know what small detail is important toll investigators check. What’s wrong with journalists doing their own investigating? It actually has lead to results police/investigators missed before.

                    We only know it’s not important in hindsight, it could still be important since they haven’t found it as you said. So you are making claims it’s not when we don’t even know yet….

                    Yeesh dude.