• jose1324@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Saying it’s not a child is high level ‘anime’ copium.

        It’s the same character. It’s a child.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Boy… Uh you really haven’t paid attention to Disneys animations for the past several decades have you…? Since the source material featured incredibly underaged characters for some stories, Disneys version made them adults. So are they “bad” and still children as well…?

          Look …I definitely do not defend when they have viably looking minors in anime and try to say “oh they’re actually a dragon” or “they’re 1,000 years old” but this argument for this situation is kinda moot if the depiction is clearly not of a 12 year old

          • jose1324@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is such a random ass ‘argument’. A remake / Disney version is not truly the same character. In this case it literally is. It’s just merch.

            But keep you doing you I guess. Enjoy the copium.