IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      16·
      6 months ago

      Languages evolve over time, all dictionaries now have OPs use of the word as the first definition.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              3·
              6 months ago

              Oh 100%, I’m just saying his use of the word is in no way wrong like half the comments seem to imply. Everyone knew exactly what he meant and the definition is in most dictionaries.

              This seems to pop up everytime the word is used and it’s a major pet peeve of mine.

              My comment is only aimed at those that think third world only means the historical definition when that hasn’t been the case for at least two decades. The word third world is almost always used to mean developing country in day to day conversation.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        6 months ago

        I guess I still go by the original definition. There are other words that offer more detail anyway - kakistocracy, gerontocracy, corporatocracy, kleptocracy, etc.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          5·
          6 months ago

          Developing countries would be the synonym for third world in the definition used by OP.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        3·
        6 months ago

        I agree language is descriptive and not prescriptive, but it sounds like comparing two categories developing vs developed may be more apt and not three like an updated 3 world model would entail. Or maybe I just find it unsettling to call something a third without referencing a third of something.