• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    Healthcare - Biden limiting drug prices helps a ton of people. Also, trump pledged to get rid of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and replace it with nothing. So… not ruining everything is also good.

    See that’s the thing, Biden would be a better president than trump if he literally pledged to do nothing. Trump has pledged to make things worse, mostly for his own benefit.

    That’s your choice: a shit sandwich or… not eating a shit sandwich. Tough one, I know.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are weirdly angry that Biden helped a lot of vulnerable people through drug pricing regulation.

      That’s what I’m saying. You’re agreeing with me.

      Some of Biden’s other first-term achievements(listed directly above) have been incredibly helpful to hundreds of millions of people.

      Weird that not eating a shit sandwich is a difficult decision for you, but maybe it explains why you don’t understand the previous comment.

      Biden isn’t a better president compared to dumps, he literally invested more in infrastructure and clean technology and climate change than any other president.

      Biden has made and is still making huge strides in civil rights.

      He’s taxing the wealthy.

      He’s making a lot of progressive strides.

      You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re agreeing with me.

        You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about?

        So why do you think I’m arguing with you?

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t.

          You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.

          You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            …but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              What I said is:

              “what do you think you’re arguing about?”

              I didn’t mention myself.

              It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

              If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

              So, what do they think they’re arguing against?

              • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s clear they meant to be arguing something

                Right…

                if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.

                Keep going…

                If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.

                Almost there…