Twitter filed a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate. “Despite our continued progress, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and its backers have been actively working to assert false and misleading claims encouraging advertisers to pause investment on the platform. X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers. Through the CCDH’s scare campaign and its ongoing pressure on brands to prevent the public’s access to free expression, the CCDH is actively working to prevent public dialogue,” the company said in a blog post Monday.
“Musk and his legal team, led by attorney Alex Spiro at Quinn Emanuel, have engaged in an aggressive campaign to intimidate, bully, and silence CCDH,” the organization said in a statement released Monday. “While Elon Musk proclaims to be a ‘free speech absolutist,’ his actions against CCDH show the lengths he will go to silence those who seek to hold him to account.”
The CCDH do not have the resources to fight Twitter alone. This is clearly an attempt to scare them into silence with legal fees.
Those who wish may donate here.
deleted by creator
Thanks!
It blows my mind how CEO’s can make such obviously shortsighted and stupid decisions.
Elon is elonning Twitter’s reputation faster and faster every day.
I mean the alternative possibility is that people dislike Elon and are trying to inflate small things into big ones.
Not that I don’t actually suspect hate speech hasn’t increased on his platform since he fired most of the staff anyway, but a company does have the right to defend itself legally against accusations and decide it in court.
It’s like if you made a company and I had a claim that you were eating babies during lunch. Your defense against me would be a lawsuit in court.
Ok, but if you fire the team responsible for making sure no babies are consumed, and your company cafeteria menu suddenly has a section called All Baby All Day, the only people who will defend you are probably also eating babies at home.
The situation of one of the largest social media platforms in the world, and the proliferation of hate speech in it, are not small things. That place has had real political impact.
Yeah, he has the right, sure. Nobody says he doesn’t, nobody says he shouldn’t. But right now it’s in the media. It’s stupid. Now there’s more attention drawn to this, and if they lose (though Elon’s musk will likely try to bleed them dry rather than try to straight up win) it’s now not just a claim, it’s a claim backed up by law. He has very little to gain with this stunt.
Just because you have a right to do something, doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do. Something that Elon clearly doesn’t understand.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Wow… You think it’s the anti-billionaires who are the MSM enjoyers? Not the billionaires bootlickers? Fucking nuts.
Removed by mod
Jesus Christ, every comment on your profile is a sad troll comment. Go outside and get a life you absolute loser.
deleted by creator
It means the person you are replying to is a troll or a moron. Or both.
Found the snowflake…
Elonning is when you make obviously really bad decisions and run something into the ground as a result of those decisions.
Removed by mod
Getting kicked out of PayPal for being a fuckwit for one.
The multiple reports from ex SpaceX employees talking about how the entire company structure is set up to trick him into making good decisions for another
Why do I get the feeling that the comment you answered to was altered?
It’s not hard. In fact, the recent Twitter rebrand to X is just his latest attempt to launch X.com - he has tried before and failed.
Tesla is getting a lot of hate for false advertising. He got kicked out of Paypal. I remember him getting heat for overpricing a SpaceX service for Ukraine. Plus his dad hates him.
Theres a lot of evidence about his failed ventures out there
Boring company/Hyperloop… where are all the underground vacuum tunnels? Oh yes… they don’t exist. Because it’s a stupid idea.
Also holder of the title of the largest loss of personal wealth ever… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_losses_of_wealth
Removed by mod
Don’t forget the daughter who hates him.
Hyperloop?
The subway for rich people!
Free speech is for my group, not the others - hypocrite.
You can write Musk instead of hypocrite. Synonyms are fine.
My comment got deleted in this post lol
Elon putting a spotlight over his own bad press
It’s good press for his crowd.
He’s operating off the notion that any publicity is good publicity. Hopefully it works but the guy has so much money that he won’t be going away anytime soon (or ever). It’s too bad that he’s such a cunt, he could have done great things but he was raised as a cunt as well so it’s kind of hopeless.
deleted by creator
To moderators: if the mega thread style doesn’t work, could we consider splitting out Musk-news to some other community? The topics comes rapidly and gain a lot of interest, but it’s such a narrow perspective on technology and just drowns other news.
EnoughMuskSpam is a thing on lemmy.world.
why join a community with musk in the name
Duh. To make sure you are getting just the right amount of Musk in your life! /s
Why would people who want to talk about Twitter/X even go to a community created by people who want to see less of it? We consider this Technology news.
The name is a way of acknowledging that people are tired of hearing about him. It’s (I think; I didn’t create it) saying, for those who want to read about this asshat but without spamming other channels, not no one cares about this.
I am also tired of him but what can I do if he keeps doing newsworthy bulshit? I’m not going to go to a community just about him, because I’m not that personally invested in him, but I also don’t think talking about current relevant events involving him is “spam”, particularly when it comes to Twitter.
At least on Reddit I used RES filters to block all posts with certain people in the subjects. Cuts down on a lot of low-effort gossip from people hate-posting news.
low-effort gossip from people hate-posting news
Thank you for the terms. Couldn’t find them anywhere. Made it hard to fit my comments in with communities not realizing this was the meta.
Yes please. This needs to be addressed.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
“How dare you give me factual information about me to my face! I will sue you!” - eturd musk
More hate speech research groups, please!
https://i.imgur.com/daCuG8G.jpg Seriously. He lies, cheats, and dchanges the rules tro suit himself. Let that sink in.
So just your average rich republican
Musk about to find out what the “Streisand effect” is
Removed by mod
Just a correction, Hitler and Nazi party never used Swastika, the original name of the symbol was “Hakenkreuz” in German.
There is no mention of the word “Swastika” in any of the writings and speeches of the Nazi party.
Hakenkreuz was wrongly translated to Swastika when the translation was carried out in English from German.
The correct translation of Hakenkreuz in English would be “Hooked Cross”.
Swastika is a similar looking sacred Hindu and Buddhist symbol, maybe because of it’s similarity this error occurred and it went unchallenged in international forums as Hindus and Buddhists didn’t even know how their sacred symbol was misappropriated and misrepresented because of mistranslation.
Assuming they’re relying on established metrics… good luck with your trashfire-smokescreen of a libel case?
Its going to be hard to prove that he didn’t Musk up twitter
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
**’X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers.‘
What do you think this changes about the discussion in any way? X being ‘free’ or not matters not one whit while they platform nazis and white supremacists.
‘the CCDH gained access to X’s data without Brandwatch’s authorization.’**
This seems like a problem for Brandwatch to address with the CCDH more than an issue for X. X’s concern should be whether or not they’re hosting nazis and white supremacists. If X has any concern, it ultimately comes to the poor way Brandwatch secured the data.
The real problem here is that Twitter/X user’s data can be easily revealed by organizations.
The publicly posted data being easily revealed by organizations is a problem?
It’s not a public service. It is a service offered to the public. That is something completely different.
That’s how defense of this stuff always works. They subtly change the meaning of commonly accepted words and terms. “Service available to the public” becomes “public service” and “Nazis are good” becomes “an opinion” instead of hate speech.
There was just an interesting about Musks Lawyer, Spiro, mentioned in the quote.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/07/31/how-alex-spiro-keeps-the-rich-and-famous-above-the-law
I feel a SLAPP…
