• DaleGribble88@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not advocating for it, but like, if they are dead they can’t really speak up about their opinions. Again, not condoning murder, but just thinking through the logic on this.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not a non-zero possibility, considering how often Biden is confusing names now. Just present his name in a brochure that seems to talk about the middle east and needing to assassinate a target, that gets it an automatic human right’s pass.

        • Matt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          By the president ordering the assassination of every Republican legislator, lobbyist and RNC operative.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’d need every Democrat and a few Republicans. Since these traitorous justices are what’s giving Republicans power, it’s pretty unlikely. Still worth trying.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, you push the issue and get people on record voting to defend blatant corruption. Then you can use it against them in the next election. House Reps run for office every two years. It’s really frustrating to watch the Democrats abandon a cause because “it will never pass the House.”

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s just to get the articles passed in the house. To get a conviction in the senate you need a 2/3 supermajority. Never happen. But it doesn’t hurt to get people on the record as opposed.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        And when that fails:

        We take to the streets We take to our representatives We disrupt everything until we solve this matter.

        You best believe there will be an out roar.

    • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There’s always a chance, it’s just very small. These corrupt justices are the end game for the republican party, the odds of any of them breaking ranks to convict is very low.

      That said, it’s almost certainly not about conviction, so much as upholding the rule of law and creating political pressure and support for something like packing the court.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The motion will get assigned to a committee, run by Republicans, where it will die. Even if there is a sympathetic Republican on that committee, all House members are up for re-election in November, and voting for this is a sure way to get the MAGAs all up in their grill and would likely lead to that person losing a ton of MAGA support, and likely losing their job.

      AOC knows this and is doing this to help Democrats in vulnerable districts, to help turn the House in the next Congress. “Elect us into the majority, and we will actually look into this.”

      • dumbluck@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        You are arguing that Republicans are, ”To busy keeping their job to do their job”. While that may be true in some cases, I fear that for some of them, breaking the Supreme Court like this was the goal all along.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would need at least some republican support, since they still hold the majority. So, not holding my breath, they tend to stick together.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, this is pro forma only. Which doesn’t mean it’s unimportant because it’s about the message. But it will not go anywhere judicially.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      None, but what matters is getting voting records so that later this year or in 2026 during House races, they can show who made an attempt to punish the traitors to our democracy, and who is in full support.