Senator Chris Murphy has dismissed claims by the supreme court justice, Samuel Alito, that the Senate has “no authority” to create a code of conduct for the court as “stunningly wrong”.

The Connecticut Democrat made those remarks in an interview on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, adding that Alito “should know that more than anyone else because his seat on the supreme court exists only because of an act passed by Congress”.

“It is Congress that establishes the number of justices on the supreme court,” Murphy said. “It is Congress that has passed in the past requirements for justices to disclose certain information, and so it is just wrong on the facts to say that Congress doesn’t have anything to do with the rules guiding the supreme court.”

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean it’s pretty clear to me. The constitution says that Congress writes all laws, and nothing about the courts is noted in powers congress does not have.

    Then about the Supreme Court, it says that justices shall serve during “good behavior”. Who could possibly define what that means legally besides congress?

    Seems pretty clear that Congress could pass many different types of laws on SCOTUS that would be constitutional. Whether that is adding more justices, setting term limits, or creating and ethics standard.

    Alito is a moron. The SC is to decide things between states and other high level topics. It’s not an untouchable organization.

    • MotorheadKusanagi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      The power to determine what laws are or are not Constitutional, that the Supreme Court wields, is also not in the Constitution.

      It comes from a precedent set by John Marshall.

      We could show them what originalism really means by revoking that power and replacing it with the will of the people.