ooli@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 4 months agoIntroverts use more concrete language than extraverts | BPSwww.bps.org.ukexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1249
arrow-up1249external-linkIntroverts use more concrete language than extraverts | BPSwww.bps.org.ukooli@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareclara@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up105·4 months agon = 40, this is junk. they couldn’t even get 100 people for this? these were all sampled from 1 company in amsterdam. the differences could be explained by company culture, or local culture, or whatever. more work needed.
minus-squarejwt@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·4 months agoThat’s very concrete language you’re using there. Are you perchance an introvert? We could make it n = 41 and add a dash more selection bias to boot!
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoanything with personality types i already assume is junk. might as well use their zodiac sign.
minus-squareSineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoShitty sample sizes are the majority of “research” nowadays. It’s sad how hard it is to find any even in the triple digits.
n = 40, this is junk. they couldn’t even get 100 people for this?
these were all sampled from 1 company in amsterdam. the differences could be explained by company culture, or local culture, or whatever. more work needed.
That’s very concrete language you’re using there. Are you perchance an introvert? We could make it n = 41 and add a dash more selection bias to boot!
anything with personality types i already assume is junk. might as well use their zodiac sign.
Shitty sample sizes are the majority of “research” nowadays. It’s sad how hard it is to find any even in the triple digits.