• unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Google’s work could encourage the adoption of MLS, much as it did with RCS.

    How can you say what Google has done is “encouraging RCS”? They literally monopolised it.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        RCS has been around since 2010

        15 years and it’s still problematic? Sounds like something that just needs to be let go.

        Stop pushing this garbage that’s tied to hardware/sim/phone number on us. What value is that for the end user, seriously? Why would an end user today want a messenger that’s tied to a phone number?

        Fully-functional, cross-platform, network-based, open-source instant messaging has been available (even on mobile) since 2009, maybe earlier.

        What I always ask about RCS: who benefits today from a messaging system that’s hard-bound to a phone number?

      • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        What??

        The RCS API on Android is only available to Google Messages and whomever Google allows (like Samsung Messages when they existed). This is the reality.

        If the RCS API was truly open there would be an explosion of FOSS alternatives to Google’s spyware.

  • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Except it’s not all messaging apps cause google messages is the only android messaging app with rcs support

        • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The idea of standards like that is that the company cant collect data, obviously that wont stop google.

          But the nice thing is that it means you can talk to people who refuse to install signal or matrix from those apps, once the protocol is established

  • christophski@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Does this protocol actually mean arbitrary cross-app messaging or would that require the app developers to coordinate in some way?

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      With you.

      Fuck RCS. It’s trash. Who benefits from a messenger, in the 21st century, that’s tied to a phone number?