• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It is not wrong and makes some vague nods at Project 2025 or what Mark Esper said, but mostly, yes. This article is about 75% “both sides.”

      It’s like the building is on fire and someone’s standing up at length and explaining how hiding in a corner isn’t a good idea, how the high height of the building and the increasing fire and the people who are actively blocking the exits are all valid significant concerns…

      Like bro LET’S FIGHT THE FIRE OR GET OUT OF THE BUILDING.

      Any article that includes phrases like “Frustration at the political sclerosis in Washington” or “a broken two-party system, growing partisan divisions” is a bunch of shit

      The problem is THEY WANT TO KILL THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS AND THE SUPREME COURT SAID IT IS OKAY FOR THEM TO DO THAT

      That’s not fucking POLITICAL SCLEROSIS

      • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        You pretty much encapsulated how I feel about it. This article is trash in the conscious belief that I might have to exercise violence to protect my family from people that think we’re an abomination to their fake friend in the sky.