• ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    None of this addresses my point. There isn’t the political power to do it.

    And even if there was, the court has already essentially overturned precedent as a concept. That can’t just be rolled back without completely reworking the court, which…see my first point…

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, it depends up getting people out to vote, especially in mid-terms.

      Precedent is literally just a tradition that’s agreed upon, there’s nothing binding judges to adhere to it, which is why the supreme court was so easily able to ignore it.

      So in that sense it’s a double-edged sword, it’s just as easy for judges to rule by precedent as it is for them to not, it’s always been this way.