Gargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 个月前Truly independent web browsergithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1156cross-posted to: opensource@jlai.lutechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1156external-linkTruly independent web browsergithub.comGargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 个月前message-square95fedilinkcross-posted to: opensource@jlai.lutechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareMonkderDritte@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 个月前Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling. Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 个月前idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with
Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling.
Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with