Dear sweet Oghma. We can’t even get rid of it on TTRPGs.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well for what it’s worth they’re likely changing the license of D&D in the upcoming edition which will be more restrictive. There are also leaks from inside the company that they are basically considering the pen & paper market dead and are going to move to focusing on the online game in their proprietary VTT app in that edition.

    So existing editions under the OGL or CC are safe, but the future edition is going to be much more of a walled garden.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The proposed change to the OGL caused such an inferno of negative reactions that Wizards of the Coast backed off of the license change. If they go through with it in the future anyway, though, then it’s still really easy to avoid. Just don’t play that version of D&D, use one of the existing ones. Or one of the innumerable other systems for TTRPGs.

      Really, it’s not hard to not use a particular tool for this stuff. Dig out the old paper books if you want to go really old school.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They backed off of making any retroactive changes to existing editions. Given the information that was leaked in January, I highly doubt they will release the new edition under any open license. They’ve made it clear that they are investing hard in a proprietary VTT experience and their goal is to monetize that VTT heavily.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then go with the second half of what I recommended above and continue using one of the older editions.

          You don’t have to use the most recent version of D&D. You don’t have to use D&D at all.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I wholeheartedly agree. In fact I’m about to start running a PF2e session in about 10 minutes lol.

      • Zeron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, they backed off because people are starting to realize WOTC needs the players more than the players need WOTC. It’s a very odd reversal compared to most industries. WOTC could explode tomorrow and people could keep happily playing D&D for years to come without any issues.

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That remains to be seen since one dnd isn’t licensed at all yet. The possibility is there for them to use a different license for the next SRD, but it given the backlash they got at the beginning of the year, I think it’s as likely they continue with Creative Commons on mechanics (which debatably aren’t copyrightable in the first place).