• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean… considering that firefox is still kind of a clusterfuck for a surprising number of websites…

    I am glad this exists but I see no practical use for it for… anyone. And the cynic in me thinks this will be even more ammunition for “just use chromium, it actually works” akin to the crowd who insist on telling every single person who is considering trying out linux to use arch or gentoo.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      … Is it?

      I genuinely haven’t encountered anything broken using it, short of Youtube. And that’s less Firefox and more all the extensions trying to make it usable, I think. There are a couple of bits of functionality missing, but in terms of sites working, it seems perfectly fine.

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve also encountered a few issues with Firefox on mobile, but not enough to stop using it as my daily driver.

        I don’t really blame Firefox though, I’d guess that their implementation is closer to the spec than Chrome’s but that companies are cheaping out on testing in multiple browsers.

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The search function of the Walmart site was broken for a year or two on mobile but it seems it’s been fixed. A few webpages I needed for school explicitly weren’t supported in non-chromium browers.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think either this will die soon or more likely it will be noticed my companies that have been screwed by Google. Google has made lots of unpopular choices with Chromium and I wouldn’t be surprised if at least a few companies started funding it in hopes that it might be viable in 5 years. It took a long time to create Chromium.

      • aleats
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they aren’t funding Mozilla, which is a far more significant company with a long history of browser development, the chances they’re gonna fund a brand-new browser that very few people have even heard about is next to none.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            While mozilla/firefox is indeed a giant mess of legacy code: Why would a company instead support a hobbyist project with almost zero resources?

            At that point we are in the mythical “What if the small business of the world united and made their own product” territory

              • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                It is not exclusively Firefox but Mozilla corp has 750 staff and 593 million in revenue according to Wikipedia.

                One million is maybe ten part time developers for a year.